Abstract
Public blockchains make every portfolio move, payment, and strategy permanently visible. While this transparency is valuable for verifiability, it also makes it easy to trace behavior, profile users, and front-run strategies. On Solana, this tension grows as activity accelerates and increasingly moves to a handful of visible addresses and explorers.
MORP OS introduces a dedicated privacy runtime that sits between a user's Solana wallet and the broader ecosystem. Instead of broadcasting every action directly from a public address, users interact with the MORP OS runtime to maintain profile-linked shadow balances, route internal flows, and only surface the minimum information required at the edge of the system. The result is a model where balances and flows can be verified and reported, without exposing all intermediate steps to observers.
01
Problem & motivation
Today, DeFi participants on Solana primarily operate through ordinary wallets. Every swap, transfer, and yield move is tied to a single public address and a growing trail of on-chain events. Even when addresses are rotated, clustering heuristics, mempool data, and portfolio analytics make it trivial to connect behavior and reconstruct strategies.
This creates several issues:
- Strategy leakage: Active traders and treasuries lose edge as their flows and positions become easy to mirror or anticipate.
- Counterparty exposure: Simple payments reveal the network of relationships between teams, vendors, investors, and individual users.
- Unbounded data trails: Every action contributes to a permanent, public dataset that can be re-analyzed indefinitely by unknown parties.
- Compliance friction: Teams that do need to report or prove activity often default to over-disclosure, because there is no structured way to share only what is necessary.
MORP OS is motivated by the idea that these problems are not a side effect of Solana itself, but of how users currently interact with it. By introducing a runtime layer designed explicitly for private yet verifiable flows, we can keep settlement on Solana while reshaping how information is revealed.
02
Design goals
Usability first
MORP OS should feel as natural as using a modern wallet interface. No complex mental models, no unfamiliar abstractions, and no need for users to think in terms of low-level privacy primitives.
Non-custodial by default
Users maintain control of their keys. MORP OS focuses on how data is exposed and how flows are routed, not on holding user funds in opaque off-chain structures.
Selective disclosure
The system should make it easy to share specific views of activity with auditors, counterparties, and tools, without revealing everything by default.
Composable with Solana DeFi
MORP OS is not a separate chain or silo. It is built to plug into existing protocols, DEXs, and yield venues on Solana through a privacy-aware routing layer.
Transparent architecture
Code, assumptions, and threat models should be inspectable. Privacy features must not rely on obscurity or closed, black-box infrastructure.
Incremental privacy
The roadmap should allow shipping useful, realistic privacy improvements before more advanced cryptography (e.g. heavy zero-knowledge proofs) is fully integrated.
03
System overview
At a high level, MORP OS introduces a runtime layer that manages how user balances and flows are represented and executed, while Solana remains the underlying settlement layer.
Users connect an existing Solana wallet to create a MORP profile. This profile maintains one or more shadow balances inside the runtime. When a user sends SOL or supported SPL tokens into MORP OS, these deposits are recorded internally as balance updates tied to their profile, rather than as simple, publicly traced transfers between visible addresses.
From these shadow balances, users can request actions such as:
- Payments to counterparties
- Portfolio rebalancing and swaps
- Yield strategy allocations and exits
MORP OS batches and orchestrates these actions through a set of on-chain contracts and off-chain coordination logic. To external observers, activity appears as a series of interactions between the MORP runtime and other Solana programs, rather than as a detailed diary of every user's personal behavior.
04
Architecture
4.1 Components
Wallet link & profiles
Users connect a Solana wallet (e.g. Phantom, Backpack, Solflare) to create a MORP profile. The profile is represented by a stable identifier inside the runtime, mapped to the signing authority of the wallet.
Confidential balance layer
Deposits into MORP OS contracts are recorded as internal balances on the profile, decoupling public transaction history from portfolio-level behavior. The chain sees deposits and withdrawals, not internal reconfigurations.
Flow orchestrator
A routing engine plans and executes actions such as swaps, payments, and yield allocations, using the MORP runtime as the visible counterparty rather than the user’s wallet address.
Adapters & integrations
Integration modules connect MORP OS to Solana DEXs, lending markets, and other protocols, allowing users to compose strategies through the private runtime instead of touching every protocol directly.
Reporting & proof layer
Over time, MORP OS will support generating auditable reports and selective proofs about activity that occurred inside the runtime, so that users can satisfy compliance needs without fully deanonymizing their on-chain history.
Observability & controls
Users should be able to see, revoke, and adjust their own MORP privileges, connected strategies, and reporting scopes without needing to inspect raw on-chain data.
4.2 On-chain vs off-chain responsibilities
| Layer | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| On-chain (Solana contracts) | Asset custody, balance accounting, enforcement of invariants, routing external protocol calls, and settlement of deposits/withdrawals. |
| Off-chain (runtime & services) | Session management, profile state views, route planning, UI, optional analytics, and generation of reports or proof artifacts. |
05
Privacy model
MORP OS aims to reduce the correlation between a user's public address and their detailed activity, without claiming perfect anonymity or formal zero- knowledge guarantees in its earliest versions.
Instead of focusing solely on hiding individual transactions, the runtime focuses on hiding the shape of the strategy and the full set of counterparties.
5.1 What MORP OS aims to hide
- Exact portfolio configuration at all times.
- The full, ordered sequence of intermediate swaps and allocations.
- Direct links between a given wallet and every protocol it touches.
5.2 What remains visible
- Interactions between MORP OS contracts and other Solana programs.
- Aggregate inflows and outflows to and from MORP OS vault addresses.
- Any activity the user explicitly chooses to surface via reports or proofs.
5.3 Threat model (high-level)
In its early phases, MORP OS assumes:
- An honest but observable L1 environment (Solana).
- Adversaries may inspect all on-chain activity and maintain long-term data archives.
- Users may face clustering attacks if they reuse addresses outside MORP OS.
Later phases can incorporate stronger cryptographic tools, such as proofs of constraints over internal balances, to further reduce linkability while retaining verifiability.
06
User flows
6.1 Onboarding & profile creation
- Connect an existing Solana wallet to the MORP OS interface.
- Approve a profile-linking transaction (or signature) if required.
- The runtime assigns a MORP profile identifier and initializes empty shadow balances.
6.2 Funding a MORP profile
- Select asset (SOL or supported SPL token).
- Send funds from the linked wallet to a MORP OS vault contract.
- Once confirmed, the runtime credits the user's shadow balances inside MORP OS, while the on-chain view only shows deposits into the vault.
6.3 Private payments and swaps
- Users specify the intent: pay a counterparty, adjust exposure, or perform a swap.
- The runtime plans a route that minimizes unnecessary external calls and executes via MORP OS contracts.
- External protocols see the MORP runtime as the counterparty; observers do not see the end-user wallet directly.
6.4 Exiting to a public address
- Users can withdraw from their MORP shadow balances to any Solana address.
- The on-chain record is a transfer from MORP OS to the chosen address, not a reconstruction of all internal steps that produced that balance.
07
Roadmap
Core concept, architecture, and design language. Publish the MORP OS thesis and initial whitepaper. Collect feedback from protocol teams, auditors, and power users.
Launch the first private balance runtime for SOL and a small set of SPL assets. Support wallet linking, MORP profiles, deposits, internal transfers, and withdrawals.
Integrate Solana DEXs and yield protocols through MORP adapters. Enable private swaps, portfolio rebalancing, and initial strategy templates that execute through the runtime.
Introduce reporting and selective proof tooling, followed by automation primitives (agents and rules) that can operate within the privacy boundaries of MORP OS.
08
Security & risk considerations
MORP OS, like any system handling value, introduces new risk surfaces. The architecture must be designed and implemented with defensive assumptions.
- Contract safety: Vault and routing logic must be audited and battle-tested, since they directly touch user assets.
- Runtime correctness: Off-chain components (route planning, reporting) must be designed to fail safely and be provable against on-chain state where possible.
- Privacy expectations: Early phases should communicate clearly that MORP OS focuses on reducing exposure, not eliminating all linkability or metadata leakage.
- Operational transparency: Upgrades, parameter changes, and downtime must be communicated clearly to avoid surprising users who depend on the runtime.
09
Compliance & selective disclosure
A key differentiator of MORP OS is that it does not treat privacy and compliance as mutually exclusive. Instead, the system is designed to help users share only what needs to be shared, when it needs to be shared.
- Exportable views of activity that occurred inside the runtime, suitable for accountants, auditors, or counterparties.
- The ability to generate time-bound or scope-bound disclosures (for specific strategies, treasuries, or wallets).
- Future potential for cryptographic proofs that show compliance with constraints (e.g. volume, counterparty rules) without revealing raw data.
This area is intentionally iterative. MORP OS should be flexible enough to adapt to a variety of regulatory contexts without overexposing users by default.
10
Conclusion & disclaimer
MORP OS proposes a path toward privacy-native finance on Solana that does not require abandoning the open, verifiable nature of the base chain. By routing user activity through a dedicated runtime, using shadow balances, internal routing, and selective disclosure, MORP OS aims to make private coordination and strategy-building feel as natural as using any modern wallet or banking app.
This document describes a work-in-progress architecture and roadmap. Details may change as the system is implemented, audited, and tested with real users. Nothing in this whitepaper should be interpreted as financial, legal, or tax advice. MORP OS is infrastructure, not an investment product.
Users are responsible for understanding their own risk tolerance, regulatory obligations, and operational security practices when interacting with any on-chain system, including MORP OS.